62 years ago -part two

Posted on Thursday, August 09, 2007 11:05 PM
Today marks the 62nd birthday of the second dropping of a nuclear bomb on a real target; at 10:58 in the morning, the city of Nagasaki was hit with the nuclear weapon known as Fat Man.

Six days later, Japan announced its surrender to the allied forces.

The statue on the photo is a statue of two kimono-clad girls, erected in tribute to the young people of Asia, who suffered in the fires of war, while trusting in the future, and to all the peace-loving people of the world, aspiring a world free of war.

The photo was taken by me on January 2, 2005 in Nagasaki, just outside the A-bomb Museum.
The statue was modeled after a painting of two young girls, lying side by side at about four kilometres from the hypocentre, their kimono becoming their shroud.
The painting was made 29 years after Hiroshi Matsuzoe, the painter, witnessed the event. A replica can be seen at the A-bomb Museum.

Personally, I think that the dropping of Fat Man three days after Hiroshima was totally uncalled for.

I'm well aware of the gruesome acts the Japanese performed during the war, and in that light, the use of Little Boy was perhaps the only way to show the Japanese Emperor that the Americans actually were willing to put their money where their mouth was at the time.
However, I suspect that Fat Man has been used mainly for research.

There were a number of cities which were kept out of the regular bombing schedule to see what a nuclear device would do. Nagasaki and Kokura (Bockscar's primary target for Fat Man) were among those cities, and based on the information I read, I gather the Americans could have waited a little longer.

But no-one knows for sure; let's just hope this will never be repeated and that some day, we will live without fear of a nuclear strike.

K.

Feedback

# re: 62 years ago -part two

8/11/2007 4:56 PM by Cailin Coilleach
1. That's a beautiful statue.

2. I once watched a long documentary on Hiroshima on Youtube. It came in four or five parts. The main subject was artwork made by people who lived through the bombing. That was a very nice doc to watch.

# re: 62 years ago -part two

8/11/2007 10:03 PM by Atomsk
The intend was to destroy the harbour. Because of heavy clouding the bomb was dropped on Nagasaki itself by mistake. Not sure if that would have made much of a difference for the inhabitants.

Anyway, the museum is impressive. I found many statues (especially those donated by the USSR) rather ugly though.

# re: 62 years ago -part two

8/12/2007 10:27 PM by Kaijuu
No, I don't think so either; you know how Nagasaki's geography lies.
I think it's even better that the bomb fell where it fell; because of the hills, the southwestern part of the city was spared. If the bomb woiuld have hit the harbour, Nagasaki would have been leveled.

Post Comment

Title  
Name  
Url
Comment   

ATTENTION: the code you need to copy is CaSe SeNsItIvE and is required to prevent spam.
Enter the code you see: